Patch Analysis for May 2011

For bulletin MS11-035, servers are only affected if the WINS service is installed. This service allows NetBIOS devices to communicate on the network. NetBIOS is not considered as secure as DNS and this may be the time to upgrade older devices that are still using it. If you have servers running WINS, give those the first attention. The LMHOSTS file can be used as a substitute for WINS (in some cases) but it’s easy to forget that if a LMHOSTS file exists it must be updated every time the IP address changes.
Two remote code vulnerabilities in PowerPoint are addressed with MS11-036. There are mitigating factors and some workarounds but ultimately the user must be relied on to not open untrusted PowerPoint files. Experience has shown that the user cannot be relied on to do the right thing. We recommend patching after testing.
BulletinExploit Types
/Technologies Affected
System Types AffectedExploit
details public?
/ Being exploited?
MS severity ratingProducts AffectedNotesRandy's recommendation

Arbitrary code

No/NoNoCritical Server 2003
Server 2008
Server 2008 R2
 Patch after testing

Arbitrary code

/ Powerpoint
Terminal Servers
No/NoNoImportant Office XP
Office 2003
Office 2007
Office 2004 for Mac
Office 2008 for Mac
Office Converter Pack
 Patch after testing

Receive Randy's same-day, independent analysis each Patch Tuesday

We will not share your address. Unsubscribe anytime. 

"Thank you. I am very glad I subscribed to this newsletter.  Relevant content clearly and concisely. Finally!!!"

- John K.

"I really like the Fast Facts on this Month's Microsoft Security Bulletins. Do you keep old copies? If yes, please let me know how I can access them?"

-Susan D.

"Thanks, Randy. Your regular updates have streamlined my monthly patching. Much appreciated,"

-  Steve T.

"Really appreciate your patch observor. In the corporate IT world, anything we can get our hands on that speeds the process of analyzing threats and how they may or may not apply to our environments is a God-send. Thanks so much for your efforts."

- Tess G.

"Many thanks for this Randy"

- Roger G.

"The chart is a REAAALLY good idea :)"

- Phil J.

"I like the table. Your insight is very valuable. "

Tom C.

"I liked your high level overview of patches in the table. There are so many sources of patch information which can be very specific or surrounded by other stuff that it’s refreshing to get everything summarised like this. The “Randy’s Recommendation” comment is useful starting point too. Please keep up the good work."

- David A.

"Your Patch Observer is a very good tool in making the decision whether to patch or not to patch. And also to patch asap or to wait a while before patching. Also I do think the use of the table is realy improving the readability of the provided information."

- Gerard T.


Additional Resources